Facial volume loss
Microfat can be used to restore carefully selected areas of lost volume and soften hollow or depleted facial contours.
Microfat and Nanofat transfer use carefully processed fat from the patient’s own body to restore selected areas of facial volume, refine contour and support improvements in skin quality.
Treatment can be tailored across the face and neck, including areas affected by volume loss, hollowing, thinning skin or changes in texture, with the aim of creating subtle rejuvenation while preserving natural facial character.
Facial ageing is not caused by skin changes alone. Loss of soft-tissue volume, changes in contour and reduced skin quality can all contribute to a tired or less defined appearance across the eyes, cheeks, face and neck.
Microfat and Nanofat are prepared differently and used for different purposes. Microfat is generally used where structural volume and contour support are required, while Nanofat is processed into a finer preparation that may be used where skin quality and regenerative effects are part of the treatment goal.
Treatment may be performed as a standalone rejuvenation procedure or incorporated into a broader surgical plan. Around the eyes, for example, fat transfer may complement blepharoplasty, upper blepharoplasty or lower blepharoplasty where volume loss and tissue quality also need to be considered.
Microfat and Nanofat rejuvenation may be considered where ageing has affected facial volume, the smooth transition between features or the quality and texture of the skin.
Microfat can be used to restore carefully selected areas of lost volume and soften hollow or depleted facial contours.
Volume loss around the eyes and lid-cheek junction can contribute to a tired appearance and may be considered as part of a broader rejuvenation plan.
Nanofat may be used where fine skin texture, thinning or reduced skin quality are part of the concern.
Treatment can be planned across selected areas of the face and neck to support a more rested, balanced and naturally rejuvenated appearance.
Microfat and Nanofat are not interchangeable treatments. The preparation used, treatment areas and amount transferred depend on anatomy, tissue quality and the objective of the procedure.
Treatment is tailored according to where rejuvenation is needed, whether the priority is volume restoration, skin quality or a combination of the two.
Facial proportions, volume loss, skin quality and the neck are assessed to determine whether Microfat, Nanofat or a combined approach is appropriate.
A small amount of fat is harvested from a suitable donor area and processed according to the needs of the treatment plan.
The prepared tissue is placed strategically to restore contour, support transitions or target areas where skin quality is part of the rejuvenation goal.
Swelling and bruising can occur initially, with the appearance becoming more refined as healing progresses and the treated tissues settle.
Where eyelid ageing also involves excess skin or prominent fat, fat transfer may be considered alongside blepharoplasty rather than as a replacement for eyelid surgery.
These answers provide a general guide. The most appropriate treatment plan depends on anatomy, tissue quality, the areas of concern and whether fat transfer is being considered alone or alongside surgery.
If you are considering plastic surgery, a private & professional consultation provides the opportunity to explore suitable treatment options, ask questions and receive clear, tailored advice based on your goals.
Complete the form to arrange a consultation at Harley Street in London. We will reply to you very quickly to arrange.